Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 21:34
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Quantum Vacuum Breakthrough: Oxford Physicists Make Light Emerge From “Nothing” - SciTechDaily
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
SEC Raises Legal Questions Over Proposed Ethereum, Solana ETFs - Decrypt
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Google reportedly plans to cut ties with Scale AI - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
As Trump touts tariff deal, China pitches itself as global trade leader - The Washington Post
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
New model helps to figure out which distant planets may host life - Space
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.